Model, compare and document investment structures across wrappers, jurisdictions and constraints — in one auditable workflow, before a single provider is appointed.
“A single holding is most of the balance sheet. We need liquidity for two branches of the family, and selling it is not the plan.”
Principal, single-family office — the situation this page is working through.Before this becomes a mandate for counsel, an administrator or an issuer, someone has to answer a harder question: which structure is even admissible here, and what does each one cost in tax, time, reporting and control?
Today that answer is assembled from memory, precedent and whoever is in the room. FinLattice generates the full space of structures, applies the rules that govern them, and shows what survives — with the reasoning attached.
Candidate structures, rule outcomes, costs, timing and tax values shown below are illustrative assumptions used to demonstrate the FinLattice workflow. They are not quotations, legal/tax conclusions or current market data.
Trade-offs on the five axes that decide this case. Comparable because every value comes from the same rule set, not from five different providers' brochures.
Values shown are synthetic scenario assumptions for product demonstration. They are not quotations, tax advice, legal conclusions or current market data. FEASIBLE · DEMO means feasible under the stated synthetic assumptions and demo rule set.
FinLattice keeps eliminated alternatives visible, together with the reason they were removed. These examples demonstrate rule semantics using synthetic constraints and demo rule identifiers.
What leaves FinLattice is the document a professional has to defend: the inputs as stated, the rules applied, every option eliminated and why, the alternatives that remain, and what is still unresolved. Signed, dated, and reproducible six months later when someone asks why this structure and not another.
We are refining FinLattice with a small group of professional users and representative structuring cases. If you are working through a complex mandate, we would like to hear about it.